
doi: 10.1111/cid.12287
pmid: 25623033
AbstractPurposeThe aim of this study is to utilize an in vitro dynamic loading model to assess the potential risk of bacterial invasion into the Implant Abutment Interface (IAI) microgap of dental implants with sloped marginal design.Materials and MethodsForty implants were divided into two groups (n = 20 per group) based on implant marginal design. Group 1 was comprised of implants with Morse‐taper connection and conventional marginal design that connected to titanium abutments. Group 2 was comprised of implants with Morse‐taper connection and sloped marginal design that connected to titanium abutments. The specimens were immersed in a bacterial solution of E. coli and loaded with 500,000 cycles of 160N using a chewing simulator. Following disconnection of fixtures and abutments, microbial samples were taken from the threaded portion of the abutment, plated and cultured under appropriate conditions.ResultsTen out of twenty implants of Group 1 and eight out of twenty implants of Group 2 had IAI microgaps colonized by E. Coli. There was not a statistically significant difference in the mean number of E. Coli CFU detected between implants of Group 1 (mean 19.2, SD 23.6) and Group 2 (mean 12.5, SD18.9) (p > .05).ConclusionsThe present study demonstrated that implants with a sloped marginal design exhibited similar risk for bacterial invasion into the IAI microgap under in vitro dynamic loading conditions compared to implants with conventional marginal design.
Dental Implants, Titanium, Surface Properties, Escherichia coli, Dental Abutments, Dental Implant-Abutment Design, In Vitro Techniques
Dental Implants, Titanium, Surface Properties, Escherichia coli, Dental Abutments, Dental Implant-Abutment Design, In Vitro Techniques
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
