
doi: 10.1111/cgf.12948
Computing direct illumination efficiently is still a problem of major significance in computer graphics. The evaluation involves an integral over the surface areas of the light sources in the scene. Because this integral typically features many discontinuities, introduced by the visibility term and complex material functions, Monte Carlo integration is one of the only general techniques that can be used to compute the integral. In this paper, we propose to evaluate the direct illumination using line samples instead of point samples. A direct consequence of line sampling is that the two-dimensional integral over the area of the light source is reduced to a one-dimensional integral. We exploit this dimensional reduction by relying on the property that commonly used sampling patterns, such as stratified sampling and low-discrepancy sequences, converge faster when the dimension of the integration domain is reduced. We show that, while line sampling is generally more computationally intensive than point sampling, the variance of a line sample is smaller than that of a point sample, resulting in a higher order of convergence.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
