Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Clinical and Experim...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Victorian trabeculectomy audit

Authors: Jennifer C Fan Gaskin; Sukhpal S Sandhu; Mark J Walland;

Victorian trabeculectomy audit

Abstract

AbstractImportanceThis study highlights the efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy in Victoria, Australia.BackgroundTrabeculectomy is currently the gold standard in glaucoma surgery. However, its role has been increasingly questioned because of its associated risks and complications. This audit aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of trabeculectomy surgery in the state of Victoria, Australia.DesignA cross‐sectional, retrospective and voluntary statewide audit of trabeculectomy surgery by individual surgeons in 2012 with 24 months follow‐up.ParticipantsTwenty‐four surgeons in the state of Victoria submitted data on 227 trabeculectomies.MethodsBasic preoperative and perioperative data were collected. Post‐operative data collected included intra‐ocular pressure measurements, glaucoma medications, associated complications and subsequent surgery up to 24 months post‐trabeculectomy.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcome measures were post‐operative intra‐ocular pressure and surgical complications.ResultsAt 12 months, the mean intra‐ocular pressure was 12.6 ± 4.1 mmHg (range 3–28 mmHg). A total of 91% of eyes had an intra‐ocular pressure ≤18 mmHg with or without ocular hypotensive medications. One‐third of eyes that were phakic at the time of trabeculectomy underwent cataract extraction within the 24 months of follow‐up. Eyes that underwent combined cataract extraction and trabeculectomy (23% of trabeculectomies) had a significantly higher mean 12‐month intra‐ocular pressure than eyes that underwent trabeculectomy alone (13.9 vs. 12.2 mmHg, P = 0.01). At 24 months, there were no cases of blebitis/endophthalmitis.Conclusions and RelevanceThe Victorian Trabeculectomy Audit demonstrates excellent efficacy and safety results that are comparable with international standards. Combined cataract extraction and trabeculectomy tended to result in a higher mean post‐operative intra‐ocular pressure than trabeculectomy alone.

Country
Australia
Keywords

Male, Medical Audit, Victoria, 610, Glaucoma, Trabeculectomy, Cataract Extraction, Tonometry, Ocular, Cross-Sectional Studies, Treatment Outcome, Trabecular Meshwork, 616, Humans, Female, Antihypertensive Agents, Intraocular Pressure, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Top 10%
Average
Average
bronze