Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Clinical and Experim...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Systemic evaluation of cutaneous sarcoidosis: 15‐year dermatology experience at University Hospital Limerick

Authors: Berbie Byrne; Alicia Goh; Nor Fatin Izham; Emma Porter; Sinéad Field;

Systemic evaluation of cutaneous sarcoidosis: 15‐year dermatology experience at University Hospital Limerick

Abstract

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease that can affect almost any organ including the skin, liver, ocular, cardiac, renal, nervous, musculoskeletal and endocrine systems. Systemic evaluation is indicated in all patients diagnosed with cutaneous sarcoidosis, as it is associated with asymptomatic systemic disease in 30%-40% of patients. Guidelines recommend that patients diagnosed with sarcoidosis undergo baseline and surveillance investigations including full blood count (FBC), renal and liver profile, Vitamin D, serum calcium, electrocardiography (ECG), chest radiography, pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and ophthalmology examination to assess for systemic involvement. Recommendations for surveillance monitoring vary on interval duration but include regular FBC, biochemistry, chest radiography and PFTs, with additional investigations and prompt referral to respective specialties as indicated.. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate extracutaneous involvement and systemic evaluation of patients diagnosed with cutaneous sarcoidosis during the period 2004-2020, and compared our findings with international guidelines. Cutaneous manifestation was the primary presentation for 67% of the patients (12 of 18), an extracutaneous disease subsequently developed in 67% (8 of 12) of these patients. Baseline investigations included chest radiography (94%; 17 of 18), PFTs (39%; 7 of 18), FBC (94% (17 of 18), renal profile (89%; 16 of 18), liver function tests (83%; 15 of 18) and serum calcium (89%; 16 of 18); ECG was performed for 4 (25%) of 16 patients. No Vitamin D levels were recorded. Specialist referral was required for 89% (16 of 18); of these 16 patients, 94% (15 of 16) required referral to the Respiratory Medicine department, 69% (11 of 16) to Ophthalmology and 19% (3 of 16) to Nephrology. The results highlight the importance of a structured protocol for the systemic evaluation of patients diagnosed with cutaneous sarcoidosis. We subsequently developed a baseline and surveillance protocol for the assessment of extracutaneous disease in patients at University Hospital Limerick.

Keywords

Hospitals, University, Sarcoidosis, Humans, Calcium, Dermatology, Skin Diseases, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!