AbstractThe cysteine protease cruzain is a Chagas disease target, exploited in computational studies. However, there is no consensus on the protonation states of the active site residues Cys25, His162, and Glu208 at the enzyme's active pH range. We evaluated the impact of different protonation states of these residues on docking calculations. Through a retrospective study with cruzain inhibitors and decoys, we compared the performance of virtual screening using four grids, varying protonation states of Cys25, His162, and Glu208. Based on enrichment factors and ROC plots, docking with the four grids affected compound ranking and the overall charge of top‐ranking compounds. Different grids can be complementary and synergistic, increasing the odds of finding different ligands with diverse chemical properties.