Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Cancer Sciencearrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Cancer Science
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Cancer Science
Article
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Cancer Science
Article . 2021
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Article . 2021
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: PubMed Central
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

MUSASHI‐2 confers resistance to third‐generation EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib in lung adenocarcinoma

Authors: Reheman Yiming; Yasuto Takeuchi; Tatsunori Nishimura; Mengjiao Li; Yuming Wang; Makiko Meguro‐Horike; Takashi Kohno; +3 Authors

MUSASHI‐2 confers resistance to third‐generation EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib in lung adenocarcinoma

Abstract

AbstractEpidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) are effective in patients with non–small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, due to acquired resistance to EGFR‐TKIs, even patients on third‐generation osimertinib have a poor prognosis. Resistance mechanisms are still not fully understood. Here, we demonstrate that the increased expression of MUSASHI‐2 (MSI2), an RNA‐binding protein, is a novel mechanism for resistance to EGFR‐TKIs. We found that after a long‐term exposure to gefitinib, the first‐generation EGFR‐TKI lung cancer cells harboring the EGFR‐TKI‐sensitive mutations became resistant to both gefitinib and osimertinib. Although other mutations in EGFR were not found, expression levels of Nanog, a stemness core protein, and activities of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) were increased, suggesting that cancer stem‐like properties were increased. Transcriptome analysis revealed that MSI2 was among the stemness‐related genes highly upregulated in EGFR‐TKI‐resistant cells. Knockdown of MSI2 reduced cancer stem‐like properties, including the expression levels of Nanog, a core stemness factor. We demonstrated that knockdown of MSI2 restored sensitivity to osimertinib or gefitinib in EGFR‐TKI‐resistant cells to levels similar to those of parental cells in vitro. An RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay revealed that antibodies against MSI2 were bound to Nanog mRNA, suggesting that MSI2 increases Nanog expression by binding to Nanog mRNA. Moreover, overexpression of MSI2 or Nanog conferred resistance to osimertinib or gefitinib in parental cells. Finally, MSI2 knockdown greatly increased the sensitivity to osimertinib in vivo. Collectively, our findings provide proof of principle that targeting the MSI2‐Nanog axis in combination with EGFR‐TKIs would effectively prevent the emergence of acquired resistance.

Keywords

Acrylamides, Aniline Compounds, Lung Neoplasms, Cell Survival, Gene Expression Profiling, RNA-Binding Proteins, Adenocarcinoma of Lung, Gefitinib, Original Articles, Nanog Homeobox Protein, Transfection, ErbB Receptors, A549 Cells, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Gene Knockdown Techniques, Mutation, Humans, Transcriptome, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Cell Proliferation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
gold
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research