
ABSTRACTThe optimal reserve price of the third‐price auction with two bidders differs from that with more than two bidders, whereas the optimal reserve price of the second‐price auction is the same regardless of the number of bidders. We generalize this result to the kth‐price multiunit auctions with single‐unit demand, and introduce a new kind of shill‐bidding incentive of bidders in order to lower the reserve price. Alongside budget constraints caused by overbidding, this may explain why third‐price auctions are rare in practice.
Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models, revenue equivalence, optimal auctions, shill bidding, \(k\)th-price auctions, reserve price
Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models, revenue equivalence, optimal auctions, shill bidding, \(k\)th-price auctions, reserve price
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
