
pmid: 31562659
Empathy in medical care has been one of the focal points in the debate over the bright and dark sides of empathy. Whereas physician empathy is sometimes considered necessary for better physician–patient interactions, and is often desired by patients, it also has been described as a potential risk for exhaustion among physicians who must cope with their professional demands of confronting acute and chronic suffering. The present study compared physicians against demographically matched non‐physicians on a novel behavioural assessment of empathy, in which they choose between empathizing or remaining detached from suffering targets over a series of trials. Results revealed no statistical differences between physicians and non‐physicians in their empathy avoidance, though physicians were descriptively more likely to choose empathy. Additionally, both groups were likely to perceive empathy as cognitively challenging, and perceived cognitive costs of empathy associated with empathy avoidance. Across groups, there were also no statistically significant differences in self‐reported trait empathy measures and empathy‐related motivations and beliefs. Overall, these results suggest that physicians and non‐physicians were more similar than different in terms of their empathic choices and in their assessments of the costs and benefits of empathy for others.
Adult, Male, Motivation, Refugees, Social and Personality Psychology, Middle Aged, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Moral Behavior, Emotional Regulation, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology|Moral Behavior, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Physicians, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Social Psychology, Humans, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Personality and Social Contexts, Female, Empathy, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology
Adult, Male, Motivation, Refugees, Social and Personality Psychology, Middle Aged, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Moral Behavior, Emotional Regulation, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology|Moral Behavior, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Physicians, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Social Psychology, Humans, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Personality and Social Contexts, Female, Empathy, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Social and Personality Psychology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
