
pmid: 25676792
AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the distribution of women with severe maternal morbidity according to Robson Ten Group Classification System (RTGCS).MethodsSecondary analysis of a multicenter cross‐sectional study in 27 obstetric units in Brazil, using RTGCS. Cases were classified into potentially life‐threatening condition or a maternal near miss or death, according to severity. Certain groups were subdivided for further analysis. Cesarean delivery (CD) rates were reported.ResultsAmong 7,247 women with severe maternal morbidity, 73.2 percent underwent CD. Group 10 (single, cephalic, preterm) was the most prevalent (33.9%). Groups mostly associated with a severe maternal outcome were: 7 (multiparous, breech), 9 (all abnormal lies, single, term), 8 (all multiple), and 10. Groups 1 (nulliparous, single, cephalic, term, spontaneous) and 3 (multiparous, single, cephalic, term, spontaneous) were associated with better maternal outcome. Group 3 had one severe maternal morbidity to 29 cases of potentially life‐threatening, but the ratio was 1:10 for women undergoing CD, indicating a worse outcome. Group 4a (multiparous, no previous CD, single, cephalic, term, induced labor) had a better maternal outcome than those delivered by CD before labor (group 4b). Hypertension was the most common condition of severity.ConclusionsThe RTGCS was useful to consider severe maternal morbidity, showing groups with higher CD rates and worse maternal outcomes.
Cesarean Section, Delivery, Obstetric, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Pregnancy Complications, Cross-Sectional Studies, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Brazil
Cesarean Section, Delivery, Obstetric, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Pregnancy Complications, Cross-Sectional Studies, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Brazil
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
