
doi: 10.1111/bioe.13249 , 10.15488/17120
pmid: 38073588
AbstractDespite its public visibility and impact on policy, the activity of expert communication rarely receives more than a passing mention in codes of scientific integrity. This paper makes the case for an ethics of expert communication, introducing a framework where expert communication is represented as an intrinsically ethical activity of a deliberative agent. Ethical expert communication cannot be ensured by complying with various requirements, such as restricting communications to one's area of expertise or disclosing conflicts of interest. Expert communication involves morally laden trade‐offs that must be weighed by a deliberative agent. A basic normative framework is introduced, and concrete provisions are proposed for codes of scientific integrity.
honesty, scientific integrity, framing, Policy, Dewey Decimal Classification::500 | Naturwissenschaften::570 | Biowissenschaften, Biologie, Communication, manipulation, expert communication, Humans, Dewey Decimal Classification::100 | Philosophie, Dewey Decimal Classification::600 | Technik::610 | Medizin, Gesundheit, science communication
honesty, scientific integrity, framing, Policy, Dewey Decimal Classification::500 | Naturwissenschaften::570 | Biowissenschaften, Biologie, Communication, manipulation, expert communication, Humans, Dewey Decimal Classification::100 | Philosophie, Dewey Decimal Classification::600 | Technik::610 | Medizin, Gesundheit, science communication
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
