
doi: 10.1111/bcp.15360
pmid: 35451097
The urgent need for appropriate treatment for suicide, the tenth leading cause of death, has led to numerous studies. This study aims to systematically identify and appraise systematic reviews with or without meta‐analyses investigating ketamine in suicidal ideation and behaviours. Scopus, ISI, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and two registries were searched without any restrictions for systematic reviews investigating the efficacy of ketamine on suicidal ideation and behaviours. The primary outcome was the final inference of ketamine effectiveness. A formal narrative synthesis was conducted, and the AMSTAR‐2 tool was used to evaluate the quality of the studies. Of 27 studies that addressed ketamine for suicidal ideation, only four reported mixed or negative results, and out of nine reviews, esketamine was significantly beneficial only in five. A transient rise in pulse rate and blood pressure, dissociation, confusion, blurred vision, nausea and vertigo were the most common adverse effects; however, most were mild. More than two‐thirds of the included studies qualified as of low or critically low quality. Preliminary evidence for the short‐term efficacy of ketamine in suicidality was noted by the majority of reviews; however, long‐term effects remained unknown. Due to the low quality of many studies and the limitations of core studies, further research is required.
Suicide Prevention, Humans, Ketamine, Registries, Suicidal Ideation, Systematic Reviews as Topic
Suicide Prevention, Humans, Ketamine, Registries, Suicidal Ideation, Systematic Reviews as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
