Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Australian Veterinar...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Australian Veterinary Journal
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
PubMed Central
Article . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: PubMed Central
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Prognostic factors in bushfire‐affected koalas–Kangaroo Island bushfire response 2020

Authors: O Funnell; J McLelland; A Kokosinska; T Stephenson; E Dunstan; B Turner; N Speight;

Prognostic factors in bushfire‐affected koalas–Kangaroo Island bushfire response 2020

Abstract

This study presents a retrospective analysis of clinical records data from koalas presenting for treatment following the large‐scale bushfire event on Kangaroo Island 2019–2020. The aim of the study was to identify prognostic factors for koalas affected by bushfire. Koalas (n = 199) were grouped based on their burn status in combination with their burn bandaging requirement at triage; those with no burns, with burns that did not require bandaging and with burns that did require bandaging. Overall, 59.8% of koalas had positive outcomes, but this reduced to only 13% of koalas in the most severely affected group (burns that were bandaged). Negative outcomes were found to be associated with several factors, including the timing of presentation, with the worst affected animals presenting in the first 2 weeks of the operation. Also, an increasing number of bandage changes during hospitalisation led to increasingly negative outcomes, with no positive outcomes beyond three bandage changes. In addition, clear associations were found with patterns of burns on feet, with only 4% positive outcomes for animals with all 4 feet burnt. All bandaged koalas with severe dehydration had negative outcomes and body weights decreased over time for hospitalised animals from the most severely affected bandaged burn group. Mild serum sodium concentration elevation at triage was the only clinically significant blood abnormality for koalas with bandaged burns. Overall, this study identified key prognostic factors, particularly bandaging requirements and the number of feet burnt, that will enable more effective decision‐making at triage and improve animal welfare outcomes.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Wildlife & Zoos, Animals, Female, Phascolarctidae, Prognosis, Burns, Bandages, Retrospective Studies, Wildfires

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Top 10%
Average
Average
Green
hybrid