Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Asian Journal of End...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Persistent Descending Mesocolon as An Intraoperative Risk Factor in Laparoscopic Surgery for Left‐Sided Colon and Rectal Cancer

Authors: Kiyoaki Hamada; Yorihisa Sumida; Keisuke Ozeki; Soichiro Kiya; Shintaro Hashimoto; Masato Nishimuta; Ayako Shibuya; +3 Authors

Persistent Descending Mesocolon as An Intraoperative Risk Factor in Laparoscopic Surgery for Left‐Sided Colon and Rectal Cancer

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPersistent descending mesocolon (PDM) represents a failure of fusion of the descending mesentery, leading to anatomical abnormalities. This study aimed to examine the effects of anatomical features of PDM on laparoscopic surgical outcomes.MethodsPatient backgrounds, surgical outcomes, anatomical characteristics, and operative findings were retrospectively compared between 186 patients classified into PDM and non‐PDM groups who underwent primary resection for left‐sided colon and rectal cancer at our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020.ResultsPDM was diagnosed in nine patients (4.8%). The operative time (337 ± 165 vs 239 ± 107 min, p = 0.010) was significantly different between PDM and non‐PDM groups, but bleeding loss was not different (108 ± 97 ml vs 53 ± 142 ml, p = 0.259). In PDM patients, in addition to abnormal fixation of the sigmoid‐descending colon junction, adhesion of the mesentery of the colon and small intestine in 100%, and adhesion between the mesocolon in 33% patients was confirmed intraoperatively. Ileus was more common in the PDM group (two cases, 22%) and in the non‐PDM group (10 cases, 5.6%), but there was no significant difference in overall postoperative complications between the two groups (p = 0.215). The duration of postoperative hospital stay (28 ± 20 vs 16 ± 11 days, p = 0.002) was significant between the two groups. The left colonic artery (LCA) could not be preserved in six patients in the PDM group, one of whom had anastomotic leakage and two of whom required additional resections due to intraoperative intestinal blood flow failure.ConclusionPDM prolonged operative times and duration of postoperative stay in laparoscopic surgery for left‐sided colon and rectal cancer. Division of the LCA in PDM patients should be considered an intraoperative risk factor for injury to the marginal artery.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Colon, Rectal Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Laparoscopy, Colectomy, Mesocolon, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!