
doi: 10.1111/ases.12365
pmid: 28727317
AbstractIntroductionRectus diastasis, when coexistent with umbilical hernia, can benefit from mesh‐based repair of the midline. Laparoscopic correction of an umbilical hernia involves the placement of a mesh in the peritoneal cavity, but this comes with the risk of bowel complications. However, newly developed dual‐sided composite meshes have helped to reduce this risk.Materials and Surgical TechniqueFour men and three women with umbilical hernia and rectus diastasis were treated with laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair. Composite mesh with a hydrophilic 3‐D polyester textile on the parietal side and an absorbable collagen barrier on the peritoneal side were placed in the preperitoneal pocket after hernial sac reduction. Mean hernia size was 2.5 cm, and no recurrences were observed during the mean follow‐up period of 9.2 months.DiscussionThe laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for umbilical hernia and rectus diastasis may be a safe surgical option when trying to avoid potential complications related to intra‐abdominal mesh positioning.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Diastasis, Muscle, Rectus Abdominis, Middle Aged, Surgical Mesh, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Peritoneum, Hernia, Umbilical, Herniorrhaphy, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Diastasis, Muscle, Rectus Abdominis, Middle Aged, Surgical Mesh, Treatment Outcome, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Peritoneum, Hernia, Umbilical, Herniorrhaphy, Aged, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
