
doi: 10.1111/apps.70075
handle: 10071/36572
Abstract Amid ongoing debate and limited empirical evidence regarding resource gain and loss spirals in conservation of resources (COR) and job demands–resources (JD‐R) theories, this study examines how resource losses and gains shape emotional well‐being trajectories over time, focusing on their momentum and magnitude. Drawing on experience sampling data from two longitudinal studies, we find compelling evidence for both gain and loss spirals with momentum and magnitude effects. Among the resource‐providing factors (life‐related and work‐related support), work‐related social support as job resources interacts with time to amplify their positive effects—individuals with higher social support experience a steeper upward trajectory of positive emotions and a faster decline in negative emotions. In contrast, among the resource‐depleting job demands (workload and perceived work‐related risks), workload interacts with time to intensify its detrimental impact, flattening the trajectory of positive emotions and suppressing emotional recovery. Furthermore, we identify a turning point in the U‐shaped trajectory of positive emotions, indicating that resource loss and gain spirals are not strictly unidirectional but may reverse direction over time. These findings advance COR and JD‐R theories by providing longitudinal evidence for resource gain and loss spirals and by integrating temporal dynamics into the understanding of how job resources and demands jointly shape emotional well‐being over time.
Emotional well-being, Job demands–resources (JD-R) theory, Loss and gain spirals, Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Psicologia, Conservation of resources (COR) theory, Experience sampling method, Resource fluctuations
Emotional well-being, Job demands–resources (JD-R) theory, Loss and gain spirals, Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Sociais::Psicologia, Conservation of resources (COR) theory, Experience sampling method, Resource fluctuations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
