
doi: 10.1111/apa.16111
pmid: 34528287
AbstractAimNeonatal encephalopathy (NE) is associated with an increased risk of multi‐organ injury. The lack of standardised definitions for multi‐organ dysfunction in NE hinders accurate quantification of these complications.MethodsA simple multi‐organ dysfunction in neonatal encephalopathy scoring (MODE) system was created to include the cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, haematological and neurological systems with a maximum score of 15. The MODE score was then compared with the grade of NE, Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Bayley‐III) at 2 years of age and mortality. The Bayley score was used as it gave an objective score making it easier to compare the MODE score. Bayley score of <90 and/or abnormal MRI as an adverse outcome.ResultsInfants with perinatal asphyxia (PA:n = 85) were prospectively enrolled (PA only n = 9; NE I = 23; NE II = 42; NE III = 11). Infants with higher MODE scores were significantly more likely to have moderate/severe NE (NE II/III: median scores (IQR) 7(5–10) versus mild NE 2 (1–3); p‐value < 0.001) The MODE score was highly predictive of mortality (AUC 0.96, p‐value = 0.002). Infants who had an abnormal neurological examination at discharge or abnormal Bayley‐III scores had significantly higher MODE scores (p‐value = 0.001).ConclusionQuantifying multi‐organ injury is important to plan optimal early management and long‐term follow‐up. Additional use of clinical biomarkers may be useful as surrogate endpoints in future clinical trials and link to multi‐organ longer‐term developmental follow‐up.
Asphyxia Neonatorum, Pregnancy, Multiple Organ Failure, Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Infant, Female, Child, Infant, Newborn, Diseases
Asphyxia Neonatorum, Pregnancy, Multiple Organ Failure, Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Infant, Female, Child, Infant, Newborn, Diseases
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
