
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1111/aos.14380
pmid: 32086859
AbstractPurposeTo study the development over time of the age‐ and sex‐standardized incidence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in Denmark.MethodsRegistry study, based on the Danish National Patient Registry data. End‐point: Individuals undergoing the first surgery for RRD.ResultsDuring 2000–2016 we identified 11 769 individuals with a primary RRD surgery in either eye. The age‐ and sex‐standardized incidence rate of RRD increased by more than 50% during the study period. We found a significant increase in this incidence rate for both men and women older than 50 years, and in men, but not in women, younger than 50 years (p < 0.001). However, the increase of primary RRD surgery during the study period was most pronounced in men aged 50 years or older, where the rate of increase was 1.7 ± 0.1 cases per 100 000 person‐years per year (p < 10−11).ConclusionThe incidence of RRD is increasing, and this increase is primarily driven by men aged 50 years or older.
Adult, Male, register study, Denmark, Incidence, incidence rate, Retinal Detachment, Middle Aged, retinal detachment, Age Distribution, Humans, epidemiology, Female, Registries, Sex Distribution
Adult, Male, register study, Denmark, Incidence, incidence rate, Retinal Detachment, Middle Aged, retinal detachment, Age Distribution, Humans, epidemiology, Female, Registries, Sex Distribution
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 63 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
