Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Acta Ophthalmologicaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Acta Ophthalmologica
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Topical cyclosporine‐A versus prednisolone for herpetic stromal keratitis: a randomized controlled trial

Authors: Mohamadreza Nayebzadeh; Alireza Peyman; Mohamadreza Peyman; Mohamadreza Peyman; Mohsen Pourazizi; Natalie A. Afshari;

Topical cyclosporine‐A versus prednisolone for herpetic stromal keratitis: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo compare topical cyclosporine‐A 2% eye drop (Cs‐A) with prednisolone acetate 1% eye drop for treatment of herpetic stromal keratitis (HSK).MethodsIn this randomized clinical trial, 38 eyes of 33 patients with HSK were randomly assigned to receive either 2% Cs‐A or 1% prednisolone acetate eye drops. All subjects received oral acyclovir 400 mg twice a day. Slit‐lamp examination, Scheimpflug tomography corneal optical densitometry (Pentacam®, Oculus Inc., Wetzlar, Germany), best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intra‐ocular pressure (IOP) were evaluated at the first visit, and 14 and 30 days after the treatment.ResultsWithin‐group analysis revealed significant improvement of total cornea optical density after 30 days of treatment in both groups (30.3 ± 10.5 to 28.3 ± 9.8, p < 0.001 for prednisolone group, and 30.5 ± 8.8 to 28.8 ± 8.3 p < 0.001 for Cs‐A group, mean ± SD). We were not able to disclose any significant difference between the two groups regarding the improvement of cornea optical density (p = 0.66). Best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) logMAR significantly improved in both groups after 30 days of treatment (0.20 ± 0.52, p = 0.002 in prednisolone group, and 0.24 ± 0.31, p < 0.001 in Cs‐A group, mean ± SD). Analysis between groups did not show a significant difference of BCVA improvement (p = 0.45). We did not observe any severe side effect attributable to drugs.ConclusionsCs‐A 2% and prednisolone acetate 1% topical eye drops are effective for treatment of HSK.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Administration, Topical, Corneal Stroma, Prednisolone, Eye Infections, Viral, Middle Aged, Slit Lamp Microscopy, Cyclosporine, Keratitis, Herpetic, Humans, Female, Ophthalmic Solutions, Glucocorticoids, Immunosuppressive Agents, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?