
doi: 10.1111/aor.13141
pmid: 29660857
AbstractThe objective of this study was to compare the effects of nonpulsatile and ECG‐synchronized pulsatile extracorporeal life support on coronary and carotid blood flow velocities using transthoracic echocardiography and vascular ultrasound, respectively. Nine adult swine were randomly separated into nonpulsatile (NP, n = 5) and pulsatile (P, N = 4) groups and placed on ECLS for 24 h using an i‐cor ECLS system. Noninvasive transthoracic images of the left and right coronary artery and the left carotid artery were acquired at the pre‐ECLS (baseline), 30 min, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 h on‐ECLS stages. The mean diastolic velocity of the left and right coronary arteries in the NP group significantly decreased after 24 h on ECLS compared to the baseline and 30 min ECLS stages (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the mean diastolic velocity of the coronary arteries in the P group at 30 min, 3‐, 6‐, 9‐, 12‐, and 24‐h ECLS compared to baseline. The P group showed a smaller decrease in the mean diastolic velocity of coronary arteries between the 30‐min ECLS and 3‐, 6‐, 9‐, 13‐, 24‐h ECLS stages compared to the NP group. The diastolic velocity of the left carotid artery in the NP group significantly decreased during 24‐h ECLS compared to the P group (P < 0.05). An ECG‐synchronized pulsatile ECLS system appeared to maintain coronary and carotid artery diastolic velocities better than conventional nonpulsatile ECLS. Further investigation of the perfusion modes during ECLS is warranted.
Swine, Hemodynamics, Blood Pressure, Coronary Vessels, Carotid Arteries, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Regional Blood Flow, Pulsatile Flow, Models, Animal, Animals, Vascular Resistance, Blood Flow Velocity
Swine, Hemodynamics, Blood Pressure, Coronary Vessels, Carotid Arteries, Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, Regional Blood Flow, Pulsatile Flow, Models, Animal, Animals, Vascular Resistance, Blood Flow Velocity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
