
doi: 10.1111/all.12800
pmid: 26505989
handle: 20.500.14243/332051 , 11584/129583 , 11591/358408 , 10044/1/29418
doi: 10.1111/all.12800
pmid: 26505989
handle: 20.500.14243/332051 , 11584/129583 , 11591/358408 , 10044/1/29418
Epidemiological research on the relationship between diet and asthma has increased in the last decade. Several components found in foods have been proposed to have a series of antioxidant, anti-allergic and anti-inflammatory properties, which can have a protective effect against asthma risk. Several literature reviews and critical appraisals have been published to summarize the existing evidence in this field. In the context of this EAACI Lifestyle and asthma Task Force, we summarize the evidence from existing systematic reviews on dietary intake and asthma, using the PRISMA guidelines. We therefore report the quality of eligible systematic reviews and summarize the results of those with an AMSTAR score ≥32. The GRADE approach is used to assess the overall quality of the existing evidence. This overview is centred on systematic reviews of nutritional components provided in the diet only, as a way to establish what type of advice can be given in clinical practice and to the general population on dietary habits and asthma.
Risk, food intake, Allergy, Age Factors, Asthma; Diet; food intake; systematic review; wheeze, asthma, Asthma, Diet, systematic review, 1107 Immunology, wheeze, asthma; diet; food intake; systematic review; wheeze; Immunology; Immunology and Allergy, Fruit, Population Surveillance, Dietary Supplements, Odds Ratio, Humans, Vitamin D, diet, Systematic Reviews as Topic
Risk, food intake, Allergy, Age Factors, Asthma; Diet; food intake; systematic review; wheeze, asthma, Asthma, Diet, systematic review, 1107 Immunology, wheeze, asthma; diet; food intake; systematic review; wheeze; Immunology; Immunology and Allergy, Fruit, Population Surveillance, Dietary Supplements, Odds Ratio, Humans, Vitamin D, diet, Systematic Reviews as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 126 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
