<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1111/ajr.12464
pmid: 30303284
AbstractParamedic services in Australia and New Zealand (Australasia) share many characteristics, with both offering versions of the Anglo‐American system of emergency medical response. Their industry and professional bodies are transnational and as a result have similar industry standards and professional expectations. The major difference been the two countries is their sources of funding, with Australian paramedic services generally receiving more government funding than those in New Zealand. Both countries provide a range of services that use a mix of volunteer and professional staff and employ state‐of‐the‐art communications and medical technology to provide high‐level clinical services. In common with other higher income countries, they face the challenge of rising usage associated with ageing populations. Both countries are adapting to this through broadening their response models, from a focus on emergency medical response to the provision of a mobile health service that will see the emergence of more practitioners paramedic roles. These emerging models challenge the core missions of paramedic services, as well as the professional identity of paramedics. Despite these trends towards higher level and well‐integrated paramedic services in Australia and New Zealand, communities and many other health professionals have limited knowledge or understanding of how paramedic services are organised, the characteristics of paramedics and allied staff and limited appreciation of their potential to make greater contributions to the health and well‐being of communities. This article provides an introduction to how paramedics, as members of multidisciplinary teams, are well placed to contribute to improvements in health outcomes.
Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Medical Technicians, Australia, Workforce, Humans, New Zealand
Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Medical Technicians, Australia, Workforce, Humans, New Zealand
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |