
ABSTRACT The rapid advancement of scanning technologies, design software, and manufacturing techniques has led to the maturation of digital workflows in prosthodontics over the past few decades. Initially perceived as alternatives to analogue workflows, digital workflows now offer significant advantages in diagnosis, treatment planning, communication, and prosthesis design and fabrication. The growing demand for efficient, predictable, aesthetic, and outcome‐driven prosthodontic treatments has led to increasing adoption of digital workflows. This integration has transformed each step of prosthodontic treatment, resulting in three digital workflows: laboratory, clinical, and combined clinical‐laboratory workflows. Although most prosthodontic treatments can now be executed digitally, a universally applicable digital workflow is yet to be established. Contrary to analogue workflows, digital workflows continue to evolve rapidly, with significant improvements anticipated in the near future that may establish them as the mainstream approach in prosthodontics. This review article aims to: (1) illustrate the importance of digital workflows in modern prosthodontics, (2) discuss available digital workflows in relation to different areas of prosthodontics, and (3) explore how recent advancements in digital dentistry are likely to shape the future of prosthodontics.
Digital Technology, Invited Review, Dental Prosthesis Design, Humans, Computer-Aided Design, Prosthodontics, Workflow
Digital Technology, Invited Review, Dental Prosthesis Design, Humans, Computer-Aided Design, Prosthodontics, Workflow
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
