
doi: 10.1111/adj.12541
pmid: 28736912
AbstractBackgroundThe Index of Dental Anxiety and Fear (IDAF‐4C) was introduced to overcome the theoretical and practical shortcomings of previously developed dental fear measures. This new scale has not been tested on population samples other than in its country of origin, Australia. The aim of this study was to validate the IDAF‐4C in a different cultural setting and to determine the prevalence and sociodemographic associations of dental anxiety.MethodsA cross sectional study of a representative New Zealand adult population sample was undertaken. The questionnaire was mailed to 523 randomly‐selected participants. Data were collected on sociodemographic characteristics, oral and general health care, and dental anxiety using both the IDAF‐4C and the Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS).ResultsThe response rate was 51.8%. The factor structure of the IDAF‐4C was confirmed. The prevalence estimates for high dental anxiety and fear were 18.6% using the DAS and 13.0% using the IDAF‐4C. Mean scores for the IDAF‐4C and DAS were higher among episodic dental visitors and those without a recent dental visit.ConclusionsThe performance of the IDAF‐4C in this New Zealand community sample supports its use for dental anxiety measurement.
Adult, Male, Psychometrics, Fear, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Sickness Impact Profile, Surveys and Questionnaires, Dental Anxiety, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Dental Care, New Zealand
Adult, Male, Psychometrics, Fear, Middle Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Sickness Impact Profile, Surveys and Questionnaires, Dental Anxiety, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Dental Care, New Zealand
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
