<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1111/acem.14223
pmid: 33527598
Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) arises from venous outflow restriction.1,2 It may occur in 20-50% of patients after a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and is characterized by edema, skin changes, pruritis, paresthesias, and pain, which can adversely affect quality of life (QOL).1,2 Adequate dosing and duration of anticoagulation for DVTs may lower the likelihood of PTS;3 however, compression therapy has also been used for prevention and treatment.4-6 While this therapy, which includes bandaging or compression stockings, has been proposed to reduce edema and improve QOL,6,7 clinicians, articles, and guidelines differ in their recommendations concerning the use of these devices for prevention and treatment of PTS.1-6 This article discusses two Cochrane reviews evaluating prevention and treatment of PTS.5,8.
Venous Thrombosis, Recurrence, Humans, Postthrombotic Syndrome
Venous Thrombosis, Recurrence, Humans, Postthrombotic Syndrome
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |