
A mail questionnaire was sent to Finnish anaesthetists and paediatricians to evaluate the risks of reproductive, teratogenic and health complications related to the professions. The incidence of diagnosed spontaneous miscarriages in anaesthetists' families was 10.2% of all pregnancies and it was 13.2% in paedia‐tricians' families. Smoking seemed to increase markedly the incidence of spontaneous miscarriages, which was 22.9% in smoking female anaesthetists and 17.2% in smoking female paediatricians. The gestation times in cases of both full‐term pregnancies and miscarriages were shorter in the anaesthetist group than those in the paediatrician group. Congenital abnormalities appeared at an equal rate in both anaesthetist and paediatrician groups, but strikingly, there were nine musculoskeletal abnormalities in the anaesthetists' children compared to no such defects in paediatricians' children. Serious diseases occurred at low frequencies, but three cases of hepatic jaundice and three cases of viral myocarditis in anaesthetists indicate possible infectious hazards to health in anaesthetic work. Different infectious diseases to the respiratory and urinary tracts were commonest among paediatricians. Cancer was not reported in the anaesthetist group. The study does not indicate that gas pollution in operating rooms is harmful to the personnel.
Reproduction, Smoking, Bacterial Infections, Environmental Exposure, Pediatrics, Congenital Abnormalities, Abortion, Spontaneous, Occupational Diseases, Teratogens, Anesthesiology, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Anesthetics
Reproduction, Smoking, Bacterial Infections, Environmental Exposure, Pediatrics, Congenital Abnormalities, Abortion, Spontaneous, Occupational Diseases, Teratogens, Anesthesiology, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Female, Anesthetics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 56 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
