AbstractBackgroundThe bispectral index (BIS) monitor is the most frequently used electroencephalogram (EEG)‐based depth of anesthesia (DoA) technology in Norwegian hospitals. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the extent and clinical impact of its use and how anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists use the information provided by the DoA monitors in their clinical practice.MethodsThis cross‐sectional survey on the use of DoA monitors in Norway used a web‐based questionnaire distributed to anesthesia personnel in all hospitals in Norway. Participation was voluntary and anonymized, and the web form could not track IP sources or respondents' locations.ResultsThree hundred and ninety‐one nurse anesthetists (n = 324) and anesthesiologists (n = 67) responded. Among the EEG‐based DoA monitoring tools, BIS was most often used to observe and assess patients' DoA (98%). Raw EEG waveform analysis (10%), EEG‐spectrogram (9%), and suppression rate (10%) were seldom used. Twenty‐seven percent of the anesthesia personnel were able to recognize a burst suppression pattern on EEG and its significance. Fifty‐eight percent of the respondents considered clinical observations more reliable than BIS. Almost all respondents reported adjusting anesthetic dosage based on the BIS index values (80%). However, the anesthetic dose was more often increased (90%) because of high BIS index values than lowered (55%) because of low BIS index values.ConclusionDespite our respondents' extensive use of DoA monitoring, the anesthesia personnel in our survey did not use all the information and the potential to guide the titration of anesthetics the DoA monitors provide. Thus, anesthesia personnel could generally benefit from increased knowledge of how EEG‐based DoA monitoring can be used to assess and determine individual patients' need for anesthetic medication.