
doi: 10.1111/aas.12543
pmid: 25982220
BackgroundVideolaryngoscopes with sharp angulated blades improve the view of the vocal cords but this does not necessarily result in higher success rates of intubation The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of using Boedeker intubation forceps in conjunction with McGrath Series 5 Videolaryngoscope (MVL) in patients with predictors for difficult intubation.MethodsThe study was conducted at the Department of Anaesthesia, Copenhagen University Hospital from September to December 2013. Patients with one or more predictors of difficult intubation scheduled for general anaesthesia were assessed for eligibility. Patients were intubated using Boedeker intubation forceps and MVL. The primary endpoint was time to intubation. The secondary endpoints were intubation success rate, number of intubation attempts, intubation conditions and post‐operative hoarseness.ResultsThirty‐three patients were assessed for eligibility, and 25 patients were included in the study with a median SARI score of 3 (IQR 3–4). Twenty‐two (88%, 95% confidence interval [74–100%]) of the patients were successfully intubated by the method with a median time to intubation of 115 s (IQR 78–247). Steering and advancement of the tube were reported as acceptable in 21 (84%) and 22 cases (88%), respectively, and excellent in 10 cases (45%) for both measures. Ten cases (40%) were intubated on the first attempt. There were three cases (12%) of failed intubation; in these cases, successful intubation was obtained by using a styletted tube.Conclusion(s)Most patients with anticipated difficult intubation can be successfully intubated with Boedeker intubation forceps and MVL. However, endotracheal tube placement failed in 3/25 patients despite a good laryngeal view.
Male, Laryngoscopy, Video Recording, Equipment Design, Laryngoscopes, Middle Aged, Surgical Instruments, Intubation, Intratracheal, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies
Male, Laryngoscopy, Video Recording, Equipment Design, Laryngoscopes, Middle Aged, Surgical Instruments, Intubation, Intratracheal, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
