Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Annals of Applied Bi...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Annals of Applied Biology
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

The grapevine microbiota: A review on the possible impacts of plant protection programs on phyllosphere microorganisms

Authors: Sofia Montanari; Anna Smaldone; Veronica Castellari; Claudia M. O. Longa; Michael Oberhuber; Peter Robatscher; Michele Perazzolli;

The grapevine microbiota: A review on the possible impacts of plant protection programs on phyllosphere microorganisms

Abstract

Abstract Grapevine ( Vitis vinifera ) is one of the most important fruit crops, but it is susceptible to several pests and pathogens. Pesticide applications are required to prevent yield and quality losses, and fungicides represent the largest fraction of treatments in plant protection programs under conventional, integrated, or organic disease management. Thus, alternative fungicides are being developed for the sustainable control of grapevine pathogens, such as biocontrol agents and natural products. In addition to toxicological and ecotoxicological tests, there is considerable interest in verifying possible effects of plant protection products on non‐target microorganisms. This review highlights recent advances in understanding the impact of plant protection programs and alternative fungicides on the taxonomic composition of bacterial and fungal communities of the grapevine phyllosphere. Amplicon sequencing studies revealed that the grapevine microbiota is primarily shaped by the plant compartment, vineyard location, and sampling time. Plant protection programs generally have only a minor impact on the taxonomic composition of microbial communities on grapevine bunches, leaves, and wood, suggesting the resilience of indigenous phyllosphere microorganisms. However, the effects of fungicide treatments can vary with fungicide dosage, application frequency, grapevine cultivar, and environmental conditions, indicating that further long‐term studies with more frequent applications are required to clarify the effects of chemical and biological treatments on non‐target microorganisms at different sampling times.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Funded by