Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Digestive...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Digestive Diseases
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Preventing esophageal strictures with steroids after endoscopic submucosal dissection in superficial esophageal neoplasm

Authors: Gyu Young Pih; Do Hoon Kim; Eun Jeong Gong; Hee Kyong Na; Kee Wook Jung; Jeong Hoon Lee; Ji Yong Ahn; +4 Authors

Preventing esophageal strictures with steroids after endoscopic submucosal dissection in superficial esophageal neoplasm

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic steroid administration in preventing post‐endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) esophageal stricture and to determine risk factors for these strictures.MethodsPatients who underwent ESD for superficial esophageal neoplasms with a mucosal defect affecting >75% of the esophageal circumference between January 2011 and August 2016 were eligible. Patients were classified into three groups, including ESD‐alone group (n = 22), oral steroid group (n = 25) and intralesional steroid injection group (n = 6). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for esophageal stricture.ResultsThe stricture rate was 50.0%, 20.0% and 33.3% in the ESD‐alone group, oral steroid group and steroid injection group, respectively. Patients treated with steroids had a significantly lower stricture rate than the ESD‐alone group (22.6% vs 50.0%, P = 0.046). Additionally, oral steroid group had a significantly lower stricture rate than the ESD‐alone group (P = 0.037). Multivariate analysis revealed that the extent of the circumferential mucosal defect was a significant risk factor for post‐ESD strictures (odds ratio [OR] 13.015, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.257‐76.077, P = 0.004). The administration of steroids (OR 0.108, 95% CI 0.020‐0.578, P = 0.009), specifically oral steroids (OR 0.109, 95% CI 0.019‐0.622, P = 0.013), was associated with prevention of post‐ESD strictures.ConclusionOral steroid prophylaxis appears to be a safe and effective treatment in preventing post‐ESD stricture and improving patients' quality of life.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection, Esophageal Neoplasms, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Esophageal Stenosis, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?