
Context prediction mechanisms proactively provide information on future contexts. Due to this knowledge novel applications become possible that provide services with proactive knowledge to users. The most serious problem of context prediction mechanisms lies in a basic property of prediction itself. A prediction is always a guess. Since erroneous predictions may cause the application to behave insufficiently, prediction errors have to be minimised. The accuracy of prediction is seriously affected by the reliability of the context data that is utilised by the method. We study two paradigms for context prediction and compare their potential prediction accuracy. We show that the designer of context prediction architectures has to choose wisely as to which prediction paradigm to follow in order to maximise the accuracy of the whole architecture. We also introduce a simulation environment and present simulation results that support the gained insights regarding context prediction.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
