
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>handle: 11499/8887 , 11454/32623
Ontologies are domain-specific constructs developed for many different purposes. But, they can be different even within the same domain. Ontology matching is a method for finding the same things in between existing ontologies by looking at semantic similarities. Especially, ontology matching algorithms are used for data integration, reuse of existing ontologies, and information discovery. However, the matching process is quite difficult to perform for large ontologies. For this reason, it is recommended that ontologies can be divided into small pieces and matched modularly. We aim to automatically separate ontologies into sub-segments in this scope of the study. Primarily, the ontology data sets have been converted into a graph structure. Then, We test two algorithms to partition graph. The first algorithm is Karger Algorithm, which finds min-cut edge set in the graph, and the second algorithm is based clique percolation. The test results for both algorithms are shown and the advantages and disadvantages of these two algorithms are explained.
Information discovery, graph partitioning, Ontology matching, Ontology, Graph partitioning, ontology matching, graph, Ontology segmentations, Graph, Semantics, Graph segmentation, Graph Partitioning, Semantic similarity, graph segmentation, Solvents, ontology matching; graph; graph partitioning; graph segmentation, Data integration, Clique percolation
Information discovery, graph partitioning, Ontology matching, Ontology, Graph partitioning, ontology matching, graph, Ontology segmentations, Graph, Semantics, Graph segmentation, Graph Partitioning, Semantic similarity, graph segmentation, Solvents, ontology matching; graph; graph partitioning; graph segmentation, Data integration, Clique percolation
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
