
pmid: 23193244
This paper presents three novel methods for speaker identification of which two methods utilize both the continuous density hidden Markov model (HMM) and the generalized fuzzy model (GFM), which has the advantages of both Mamdani and Takagi-Sugeno models. In the first method, the HMM is utilized for the extraction of shape-based batch feature vector that is fitted with the GFM to identify the speaker. On the other hand, the second method makes use of the Gaussian mixture model (GMM) and the GFM for the identification of speakers. Finally, the third method has been inspired by the way humans cash in on the mutual acquaintances while identifying a speaker. To see the validity of the proposed models [HMM-GFM, GMM-GFM, and HMM-GFM (fusion)] in a real-life scenario, they are tested on VoxForge speech corpus and on the subset of the 2003 National Institute of Standards and Technology evaluation data set. These models are also evaluated on the corrupted VoxForge speech corpus by mixing with different types of noisy signals at different values of signal-to-noise ratios, and their performance is found superior to that of the well-known models.
Biometry, Fuzzy Logic, Speech Production Measurement, Artificial Intelligence, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Normal Distribution, Humans, Information Storage and Retrieval, Algorithms, Markov Chains, Pattern Recognition, Automated
Biometry, Fuzzy Logic, Speech Production Measurement, Artificial Intelligence, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Normal Distribution, Humans, Information Storage and Retrieval, Algorithms, Markov Chains, Pattern Recognition, Automated
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
