
This paper deals with the two most used arresters models applied in digital simulations with the Alternative Transients Program, the conventional, and IEEE models. It presents a model analysis and parameter adjustment procedures to the conventional model. It also presents an application to both models of different types of current and voltage surges and even power frequency voltage, with a comparison of the results obtained with both models and with typical manufacturer data. While adjustment of the IEEE model was difficult and laborious, the conventional model presented a straightforward procedure. The results obtained show that there is a close agreement between the two models when the surge front time is above 1/2 μs. The conventional model always presents higher values for the limiting and residual voltages, and better agreement with the typical manufacturer data. Thus, the conventional model presents the advantages of simplicity and more conservative results.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
