
Readability formulas are becoming increasingly popular as a tool that writers use to test and revise their material. Used appropriately, a readability formula can provide a quick and easy general measure of how difficult a text may be for its readers. Writers who use a readability formula, however, should do so with caution. Just as an engineer must know the specifications, uses, and limitations of any methodology or tool in the profession, the technical writer needs to understand the origins, uses, and limitations of readability formulas. In this brief paper, I want to give the readers of the IEEE Transactions some background on readability formulas, discuss eight aspects of writing that readability formulas will not help with, and explain why writers should not use readability formulas as a guide to rewriting.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
