
Most existing person re-identification (re-id) methods rely on supervised model learning on per-camera-pair manually labelled pairwise training data. This leads to poor scalability in a practical re-id deployment, due to the lack of exhaustive identity labelling of positive and negative image pairs for every camera-pair. In this work, we present an unsupervised re-id deep learning approach. It is capable of incrementally discovering and exploiting the underlying re-id discriminative information from automatically generated person tracklet data end-to-end. We formulate an Unsupervised Tracklet Association Learning (UTAL) framework. This is by jointly learning within-camera tracklet discrimination and cross-camera tracklet association in order to maximise the discovery of tracklet identity matching both within and across camera views. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of the proposed model over the state-of-the-art unsupervised learning and domain adaptation person re-id methods on eight benchmarking datasets.
Accepted to appear in IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. The new dataset is publicly available at https://github.com/liminxian/DukeMTMC-SI-Tracklet
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Training data, multi-task deep learning, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Data models, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Adaptation models, Deep learning, trajectory fragmentation, Cameras, Unsupervised learning, Person re-identification, Labeling, unsupervised tracklet association
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Training data, multi-task deep learning, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Data models, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Adaptation models, Deep learning, trajectory fragmentation, Cameras, Unsupervised learning, Person re-identification, Labeling, unsupervised tracklet association
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 137 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
