
pmid: 20724754
Most traditional face recognition systems attempt to achieve a low recognition error rate, implicitly assuming that the losses of all misclassifications are the same. In this paper, we argue that this is far from a reasonable setting because, in almost all application scenarios of face recognition, different kinds of mistakes will lead to different losses. For example, it would be troublesome if a door locker based on a face recognition system misclassified a family member as a stranger such that she/he was not allowed to enter the house, but it would be a much more serious disaster if a stranger was misclassified as a family member and allowed to enter the house. We propose a framework which formulates the face recognition problem as a multiclass cost-sensitive learning task, and develop two theoretically sound methods for this task. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed methods.
Databases, Factual, Biometric Identification, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Face, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Algorithms
Databases, Factual, Biometric Identification, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Face, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 128 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
