
pmid: 19372611
Context plays an important role when performing classification, and in this paper we examine context from two perspectives. First, the classification of items within a single task is placed within the context of distinct concurrent or previous classification tasks (multiple distinct data collections). This is referred to as multi-task learning (MTL), and is implemented here in a statistical manner, using a simplified form of the Dirichlet process. In addition, when performing many classification tasks one has simultaneous access to all unlabeled data that must be classified, and therefore there is an opportunity to place the classification of any one feature vector within the context of all unlabeled feature vectors; this is referred to as semi-supervised learning. In this paper we integrate MTL and semi-supervised learning into a single framework, thereby exploiting two forms of contextual information. Example results are presented on a "toy" example, to demonstrate the concept, and the algorithm is also applied to three real data sets.
Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Models, Theoretical, Algorithms, Pattern Recognition, Automated
Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Models, Theoretical, Algorithms, Pattern Recognition, Automated
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 57 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
