
pmid: 15747797
Although curvature estimation from a given mesh or regularly sampled point set is a well-studied problem, it is still challenging when the input consists of a cloud of unstructured points corrupted by misalignment error and outlier noise. Such input is ubiquitous in computer vision. In this paper, we propose a three-pass tensor voting algorithm to robustly estimate curvature tensors, from which accurate principal curvatures and directions can be calculated. Our quantitative estimation is an improvement over the previous two-pass algorithm, where only qualitative curvature estimation (sign of Gaussian curvature) is performed. To overcome misalignment errors, our improved method automatically corrects input point locations at subvoxel precision, which also rejects outliers that are uncorrectable. To adapt to different scales locally, we define the RadiusHit of a curvature tensor to quantify estimation accuracy and applicability. Our curvature estimation algorithm has been proven with detailed quantitative experiments, performing better in a variety of standard error metrics (percentage error in curvature magnitudes, absolute angle difference in curvature direction) in the presence of a large amount of misalignment noise.
Curvature tensor, Curvature, Information Storage and Retrieval, Reproducibility of Results, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Image Enhancement, Sensitivity and Specificity, Feedback, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Artificial Intelligence, 516, Subtraction Technique, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Tensor voting, Algorithms
Curvature tensor, Curvature, Information Storage and Retrieval, Reproducibility of Results, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted, Image Enhancement, Sensitivity and Specificity, Feedback, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Artificial Intelligence, 516, Subtraction Technique, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Tensor voting, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 43 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
