
pmid: 15688558
We describe some techniques that can be used to represent and detect deformable shapes in images. The main difficulty with deformable template models is the very large or infinite number of possible nonrigid transformations of the templates. This makes the problem of finding an optimal match of a deformable template to an image incredibly hard. Using a new representation for deformable shapes, we show how to efficiently find a global optimal solution to the nonrigid matching problem. The representation is based on the description of objects using triangulated polygons. Our matching algorithm can minimize a large class of energy functions, making it applicable to a wide range of problems. We present experimental results of detecting shapes in medical images and images of natural scenes. Our method does not depend on initialization and is very robust, yielding good matches even in images with high clutter. We also consider the problem of learning a nonrigid shape model for a class of objects from examples. We show how to learn good models while constraining them to be in the form required by the matching algorithm.
Information Storage and Retrieval, Reproducibility of Results, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Image Enhancement, Sensitivity and Specificity, Elasticity, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Artificial Intelligence, Subtraction Technique, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Algorithms
Information Storage and Retrieval, Reproducibility of Results, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Image Enhancement, Sensitivity and Specificity, Elasticity, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Artificial Intelligence, Subtraction Technique, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 114 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
