
A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art optical fiber and preform index-profiling methods has been prepared. The advantages and disadvantages of the various approaches are discussed. Important parameters include measurement accuracy, resolution, simplicity, and the nondestructive features of some methods. Both optical and nonoptical techniques have been treated. Resolution considerations probably favor the refracted near-field technique and this may be a decisive factor for the measurement of single-mode fibers. Simplicity of apparatus lies with near-field methods generally so that the bound near-field method is most often used for dimensional measurements. Preform profiling is dominated by deflection function methods, usually accompanied by spatial filtering or focusing. Methods restricted to certain classes of fiber, such as the far-field approaches, are less attractive and, consequently, do not receive as much use.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
