Views provided by UsageCounts
handle: 20.500.14243/43625 , 11365/7453 , 11380/1170198
This paper addresses the problem of assessing distortions produced by watermarking 3-D meshes. In particular, a new methodology for subjective evaluation of the quality of 3-D objects is proposed and implemented. Two objective metrics derived from measures of surface roughness are then proposed and their efficiency to predict the perceptual impact of 3-D watermarking is assessed and compared with the state of the art. Results obtained showgood correlations between the proposed objective metrics and subjective assessments by human observers.
Objective metric, Subjective evaluation, perceptual metrics, Mesh watermarking, 3-D objects quality assessment; 3-D watermarking; Mesh watermarking; Objective metrics; Perceptual metrics; Subjective evaluation, 3-D objects quality assessment, Perceptual metric, objective metrics, 3-D watermarking, 025, I.3 Computer Grahics, 3-D objects quality assessment; 3-D watermarking; Mesh watermarking; Objective metrics; Perceptual metrics; Subjective evaluation;, 3D objects quality assessment, 3D watermarking
Objective metric, Subjective evaluation, perceptual metrics, Mesh watermarking, 3-D objects quality assessment; 3-D watermarking; Mesh watermarking; Objective metrics; Perceptual metrics; Subjective evaluation, 3-D objects quality assessment, Perceptual metric, objective metrics, 3-D watermarking, 025, I.3 Computer Grahics, 3-D objects quality assessment; 3-D watermarking; Mesh watermarking; Objective metrics; Perceptual metrics; Subjective evaluation;, 3D objects quality assessment, 3D watermarking
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 115 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
| views | 119 |

Views provided by UsageCounts