
In this paper, list decoding of crisscross errors in arrays over finite fields is considered. For this purpose, the so-called cover metric is used, where the cover of a matrix is a set of rows and columns which contains all non-zero elements of the matrix. A Johnson-like upper bound on the maximum list size in the cover metric is derived, showing that the list of codewords has polynomial size up to a certain radius. Furthermore, a simple list decoding algorithm for a known optimal code construction is presented, which decodes errors in the cover metric up to our upper bound. These results reveal significant differences between the cover metric and the rank metric and show that the cover metric is more suitable for correcting crisscross errors.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
