
In this paper, new upper and lower bounds are first presented for the rate loss of multiple description source codes (MDSCs). For a two-description MDSC (2DSC), the rate loss of description i with distortion Di is defined as Li=Ri-R(Di), i ∈ {1,2}, where Ri is the rate of the ith description and R(D) is the rate-distortion function for the given source; the joint rate loss associated with decoding the two descriptions together to achieve central distortion D0 is measured as L0=R1+R2-R(D0). Consider an arbitrary memoryless source with variance σ2 and let the distortion measure be the mean squared error distortion measure. It is shown that for any optimal 2DSC, (a)0 ≤ L0 ≤ 0.8802 and 0 ≤ L1,L2 ≤ 0.3802 if D0 ≤ D1+D2-σ2 ; (b) 0 ≤ L1, L2 ≤ 0.4401 if D0 ≥ (1/D1+1/D2-1/σ2)-1; (c) 0 ≤ L1,L2 ≤ 0.3802 and R(max{D1,D2})-1 ≤ L0 ≤ R(max{D1,D2})+0.3802 for all other D0 . A tighter bound on the distance between the El Gamal-Cover inner bound and the achievable region is also presented. Inspired by these new bounds, a low-complexity composite 2DSC design first developed by Lastras-Montano and Castelli is extended and the resulting code is shown to be near-optimal for all memoryless sources and all distortions. These results are also extended to MDSCs with an arbitrary number of packets. Finally, Gaussian sources are analyzed in detail to verify these bounds and examine their tightness.
successively refinable sources, ECDQ, Shannon bound, Balanced multiple description source code, lossy source coding, 004
successively refinable sources, ECDQ, Shannon bound, Balanced multiple description source code, lossy source coding, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
