
Basic structural properties of tail-biting trellises are investigated. We start with rigorous definitions of various types of minimality for tail-biting trellises. We then show that biproper and/or nonmergeable tail-biting trellises are not necessarily minimal, even though every minimal tail-biting trellis is biproper. Next, we introduce the notion of linear (or group) trellises and prove, by example, that a minimal tail-biting trellis for a binary linear code need not have any linearity properties whatsoever. We observe that a trellis - either tail-biting or conventional - is linear if and only if it factors into a product of elementary trellises. Using this result, we show how to construct, for any given linear code /spl Copf/, a tail-biting trellis that minimizes the product of state-space sizes among all possible linear tail-biting trellises. We also prove that every minimal linear tail-biting trellis for /spl Copf/ arises from a certain n/spl times/n characteristic matrix, and show how to compute this matrix in time O(n/sup 2/) from any basis for /spl Copf/. Furthermore, we devise a linear-programming algorithm that starts with the characteristic matrix and produces a linear tail-biting trellis for /spl Copf/; which minimizes the maximum state-space size. Finally, we consider a generalized product construction for tail-biting trellises, and use it to prove that a linear code /spl Copf/ and its dual /spl Copf//sup /spl perp///spl Copf//sup /spl perp///spl Copf//sup /spl perp///spl Copf//sup /spl perp// have the same state-complexity profiles.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
