
pmid: 22194245
User interaction is an effective way to handle the semantic gap problem in image annotation. To minimize user effort in the interactions, many active learning methods were proposed. These methods treat the semantic concepts individually or correlatively. However, they still neglect the key motivation of user feedback: to tackle the semantic gap. The size of the semantic gap of each concept is an important factor that affects the performance of user feedback. User should pay more efforts to the concepts with large semantic gaps, and vice versa. In this paper, we propose a semantic-gap-oriented active learning method, which incorporates the semantic gap measure into the information-minimization-based sample selection strategy. The basic learning model used in the active learning framework is an extended multilabel version of the sparse-graph-based semisupervised learning method that incorporates the semantic correlation. Extensive experiments conducted on two benchmark image data sets demonstrated the importance of bringing the semantic gap measure into the active learning process.
multilabel, Active learning, Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects), sparse graph, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, Information Storage and Retrieval, Documentation, Image Enhancement, image annotation, Machine vision and scene understanding, 004, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Semantics, semantic gap, Artificial Intelligence, Subtraction Technique, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Algorithms
multilabel, Active learning, Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects), sparse graph, Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence, Information Storage and Retrieval, Documentation, Image Enhancement, image annotation, Machine vision and scene understanding, 004, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Semantics, semantic gap, Artificial Intelligence, Subtraction Technique, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 85 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
