
The academia largely relies on two classes of circuits to benchmark its developments in the field of DFT. The first class are academic benchmarks such as ISCAS-85 [1], ISCAS-89 [2] and ITC-99 [3] circuits. They are reasonably old and thus significantly smaller than today's realistic designs. Furthermore, their characteristics may not match the properties of recent designs. This might facilitate developments which are not useful for current circuits. For instance, ISCAS-85 circuits tend to have many reconvergen- cies and thus a huge number of paths through combinational logic. This triggered adding functionality handling recon- vergencies efficiently to academic test generation tools. This functionality may not be highly relevant in today's practice
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
