
This paper raises the issue of why test engineers often do not act in ways which test economics says are optimal. The new field of behavioral economics explains why people often do not act in their economic self interest, and the authors propose that some of the same principles, applied to testing, can explain some of the behavior of test engineers. The authors use several examples to illustrate these principles, and for each describe the underlying economic and behavioral economic principles behind them, and give recommendations for decision makers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
