
Clustering validation indexes are intended to assess the goodness of clustering results. Many methods used to estimate the number of clusters rely on a validation index as a key element to find the correct answer. This paper presents a new validation index based on graph concepts, which has been designed to find arbitrary shaped clusters by exploiting the spatial layout of the patterns and their clustering label. This new clustering index is combined with a solid statistical detection framework, the gap statistic. The resulting method is able to find the right number of arbitrary-shaped clusters in diverse situations, as we show with examples where this information is available. A comparison with several relevant validation methods is carried out using artificial and gene expression data sets. The results are very encouraging, showing that the underlying structure in the data can be more accurately detected with the new clustering index. Our gene expression data results also indicate that this new index is stable under perturbation of the input data.
Gene Expression Profiling, Reproducibility of Results, CLUSTERING, Genomics, VALIDATION INDEX, Neoplasms, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2, Databases, Genetic, GENOMIC DATA, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Computer Simulation, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2, Algorithms
Gene Expression Profiling, Reproducibility of Results, CLUSTERING, Genomics, VALIDATION INDEX, Neoplasms, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2, Databases, Genetic, GENOMIC DATA, Cluster Analysis, Humans, Computer Simulation, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
