
arXiv: 2002.05796
FPGAs excel in low power and high throughput computations, but they are challenging to program. Traditionally, developers rely on hardware description languages like Verilog or VHDL to specify the hardware behavior at the register-transfer level. High-Level Synthesis (HLS) raises the level of abstraction, but still requires FPGA design knowledge. Programmers usually write pragma-annotated C/C++ programs to define the hardware architecture of an application. However, each hardware vendor extends its own C dialect using its own vendor-specific set of pragmas. This prevents portability across different vendors. Furthermore, pragmas are not first-class citizens in the language. This makes it hard to use them in a modular way or design proper abstractions. In this paper, we present AnyHLS, an approach to synthesize FPGA designs in a modular and abstract way. AnyHLS is able to raise the abstraction level of existing HLS tools by resorting to programming language features such as types and higher-order functions as follows: It relies on partial evaluation to specialize and to optimize the user application based on a library of abstractions. Then, vendor-specific HLS code is generated for Intel and Xilinx FPGAs. Portability is obtained by avoiding any vendor-specific pragmas at the source code. In order to validate achievable gains in productivity, a library for the domain of image processing is introduced as a case study, and its synthesis results are compared with several state-of-theart Domain-Specific Language (DSL) approaches for this domain.
12 pages, 9 figures
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Programming Languages, 004, Programming Languages (cs.PL)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Programming Languages, 004, Programming Languages (cs.PL)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
