
In this paper, an unsupervised algorithm, called the Independent Histogram Pursuit (IHP), for segmenting dermatological lesions is proposed. The algorithm estimates a set of linear combinations of image bands that enhance different structures embedded in the image. In particular, the first estimated combination enhances the contrast of the lesion to facilitate its segmentation. Given an N-band image, this first combination corresponds to a line in N dimensions, such that the separation between the two main modes of the histogram obtained by projecting the pixels onto this line, is maximized. The remaining combinations are estimated in a similar way under the constraint of being orthogonal to those already computed. The performance of the algorithm is tested on five different dermatological datasets. The results obtained on these datasets indicate the robustness of the algorithm and its suitability to deal with different types of dermatological lesions. The boundary detection precision using k-means segmentation was close to 97%. The proposed algorithm can be easily combined with the majority of classification algorithms.
Skin Neoplasms, Artificial Intelligence, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Dermoscopy, Image Enhancement, Melanoma, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms, Pattern Recognition, Automated
Skin Neoplasms, Artificial Intelligence, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Dermoscopy, Image Enhancement, Melanoma, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms, Pattern Recognition, Automated
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 107 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
